Skip to main content

लेकिन कमीज थी किसी और की।



रास्ते लग तो रहे थे आसान ।।। लेकिन जाना बहुत दूर तक था ।।
कुछ तैयारी से जैसे तैसे कदम बढ़ाया मंजिल की तरफ ।।। आगे निकल तो आये लेकिन कमीज थी किसी और की ।।
अँधेरे में उसी को अपनी मानकर हम आगे बढ़ गए ।।। लेकिन कमीज थी पुराने अंधे कारीगर के तजुर्बे से बनी बिलकुल वैसी जैसी वो चाहता था ।।
मानो दूसरा कदम ही था मंजिल की ओर पड़ने लगे ठण्ड के थपेड़े ।।। मेरी कमीज होती तो शायद सह लेती लेकिन कमीज थी किसी और की ।।
अब आगे बढ़ते जाना भी था मुश्किल ।।। और पीछे मुड़ के जाते भी तो कहाँ लगता था मानो पीछे वाला रास्ता तो कभी था ही नही ।।
बस फिर क्या था आकांक्षाओं ने वहीं दम तोड़ दिया क्यूंकि कमीज थी किसी और की ।।
मेरी कमीज थी छोटी लेकिन यकीन था उस पर की इस कमीज से ज्यादा टिक जाती क्यूकी बनी थी वो मेरे भरोसे और मेरे तर्जुबे की डोर से ।।
लेकिन मेरे ही अँधेरे ने मेरे रास्ते छीन लिए क्यूंकि कमीज थी किसी और की ।।
अगर बच भी जाते ठण्ड के थपेड़ो से पा भी लेते मंजिल हो जाती चाहत पूरी फिर भी हार मेरी ही होती ।।
क्यूंकि जीतता तो कोई और क्यूंकि कमीज थी किसी और की ।।


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Extension of British Paramountcy

British Paramountcy followed two-fold approach for Expansion and Consolidation of British power in India  Policy of annexation by conquest or war Policy of annexation by diplomacy and administrative mechanism Under "Policy of annexation by diplomacy and administrative mechanism" head we would discuss three policies- Ring-fence Policy – Warren Hastings Subsidiary Alliance – Wellesley Doctrine of Lapse – Dalhousie The Policy of Ring-Fence:  Aimed at creating buffer zones to defend the Company’s frontiers, it was the policy of defence of their neighbors’ frontiers for safeguarding their own territories. This policy of Warren Hastings was reflected in his war against the Marathas and Mysore. To safeguard Company’s territories was from the Afghan invaders and the Marathas, the Company undertook to organise the defence of the frontiers of Awadh on the condition that that the Nawab would defray the expenses of the defending army. The states brou...

How To Stay Motivated !

Imagine you are playing tennis. If you try to play a serious match against a four-year-old, you will quickly become bored. The match is too easy. On the opposite end of the spectrum, if you try to play a serious match against a professional tennis player like Roger Federer or Serena Williams, you will find yourself demotivated for a different reason. The match is too difficult. Compare these experiences to playing tennis against someone who is your equal. As the game progresses, you win a few points and you lose a few points. You have a chance of winning the match, but only if you really try. Your focus narrows, distractions fade away, and you find yourself fully invested in the task at hand. The challenge you are facing is “just manageable.” Victory is not guaranteed, but it is possible. Tasks like these, science has found, are the most likely to keep us motivated in the long term. Human beings love challenges, but only if they are within the optimal zone of difficulty. Task...

Public Funding Of Elections

What is state or public funding of elections? This means that government gives funds to political parties or candidates for contesting elections. Its main purpose is to make it unnecessary for contestants to take money from powerful moneyed interests so that they can remain clean. Why public funding is good?  Political parties and candidates need money for their electoral campaigns, to keep contacts with their constituencies, to prepare policy decisions and to pay professional staff. Therefore, public funding is a natural and necessary cost of democracy.  Public funding can limit the influence of interested money and thereby help curb corruption.  Public funding can increase transparency in party and candidate finance and thereby help curb corruption.  In societies where many citizens are under or just above the poverty line, they cannot be expected to donate large amounts of money to political parties or candidates. If parties and candidates recei...